Legal Opinion
In Re Mitrano
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 17, 2008No. 07-BG-656PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge, Retired:
This original disciplinary matter is before us on the recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility to disbar respondent (hereafter Mitrano) and require restitution as a condition of reinstatement. The recommendation is based on findings of fact by a Hearing Committee, “adopted ... with minor revisions” by the Board, and the conclusions of both the Hearing Committee and the Board that Mitrano engaged in misconduct consisting of the following violations of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct: 8.4(b) (commission of “criminal…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Olekanma A. Ekekwe-KauffmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In re Andrew J. KlineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Cerron H. Hawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re MitranoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- In re JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.