Simon v. Van De Hey
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.
Appellant seeks reversal of the judgment on the following bases:
First: The trial court’s instruction to the jury on the subject of management and control was prejudicially erroneous.
Second: There was no credible evidence to support the jury’s finding that the plaintiff was negligent as to management and control.
Third: There was no credible evidence to support the jury’s finding that the plaintiff was negligent as to speed.
Fourth: The defendant Van de Hey was negligent as a matter of law for failure to yield the right of way.
Fifth: The trial court improperly refused to submit to the jury the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Czerniakowski v. National Ice & Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Schulz v. General Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. RussellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Dachelet v. Home Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kink v. CombsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Totsky v. Riteway Bus Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Vanderkarr v. BergsmaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Dennik v. Fox River Bus Lines, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- West Bend Mutual Insurance v. ChristensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.