Legal Opinion

Simon v. Van De Hey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

Appellant seeks reversal of the judgment on the following bases:

First: The trial court’s instruction to the jury on the subject of management and control was prejudicially erroneous.

Second: There was no credible evidence to support the jury’s finding that the plaintiff was negligent as to management and control.

Third: There was no credible evidence to support the jury’s finding that the plaintiff was negligent as to speed.

Fourth: The defendant Van de Hey was negligent as a matter of law for failure to yield the right of way.

Fifth: The trial court improperly refused to submit to the jury the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Czerniakowski v. National Ice & Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Schulz v. General Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. RussellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Dachelet v. Home Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kink v. CombsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Totsky v. Riteway Bus Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Vanderkarr v. BergsmaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Dennik v. Fox River Bus Lines, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. West Bend Mutual Insurance v. ChristensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API