West Bend Mutual Insurance v. Christensen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
The issues on this appeal concern the instructions given to the jury and the sufficiency of the evidence in support of the apportionment of negligence. At the trial, the Retsons submitted written requested instructions, which were refused by the trial court. This procedure is sufficient and proper as a basis for their claim without additional objection that the instructions given in place thereof by the trial court were erroneous. See: Boiler v. Cofrances (1969), 42 Wis. 2d 170, 166 N. W. 2d 129; Metcalf v. Consolidated Badger Co-operative (1965), 28 Wis. 2d 552, 137 N. W. 2d 457; Balen v.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kink v. CombsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Strahlendorf v. Walgreen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Jones v. MonsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Boller v. CofrancesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DixWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Peot v. FerraroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Foss v. Town of KronenwetterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
- Buerosse v. Dutchland Dairy Restaurants, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- La Chance v. Thermogas Co. of LenaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984