Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Russell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1943PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.

The cause of action was submitted to the jury on a special verdict consisting of six questions. In answering these questions, the jury found: (1) That on June 8, 1937, the defendants did not know where the cable was located; (2) that the defendants were in possession of facts from which they should, by using reasonable care, have known about where the cable was located; (3) by a vote of ten to two, that the cable was not broken by the scow with anchors and the tug operated by the defendants on or about June 8, 1937. The answer to question No. 3 made it unnecessary for the jury to answer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Muench v. HeinemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Hay v. City of BarabooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Maxon v. GatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Klatte v. Franklin State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. EscobedoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Czerniakowski v. National Ice & Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Home Savings Bank v. GertenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Weber v. WaltersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Wills v. ReganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API