Legal Opinion

Pollak Import Export Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 14, 1992No. Court No. 88-08-00649Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Goldberg, Judge:

Plaintiff challenges the classification of certain merchandise imported from Hong Kong and described on the customs invoices as “wool knitted cardigan sweaters (ladies 100% wool knitted jacket).”

Customs classified the merchandise under item 384.62 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), as “Other women’s, girls’ or infants’ wearing apparel, not ornamented: Of wool: Knit: Other: Valued over $5 per pound: Coats.” Duty was assessed at the rate of 20 per cen-tum ad valorem plus $.32 per pound for entries made during 1986 and 20 per centum…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Carborundum Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  4. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  5. Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API