Legal Opinion

Watts v. Bublitz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is an action of ejectment. Plaintiff made his case by showing the patent from the government and the mesne conveyances to himself, and rested. Defendant introduced and relied upon his deed from the Auditor General for the taxes of 1887, and rested. Plaintiff then offered in evidence the tax roll and return of the township of Merritt, for the purpose’ of showing the invalidity of the tax. This, on objection, was excluded by the court. The ruling was correct, and is within the rule of Cole v. Shelp, 98 Mich. 56.

Plaintiff then offered in evidence the files in the matter of the petition of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King v. HarringtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Millard v. TruaxMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Montgomery v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Cole v. ShelpMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Detroit Life Insurance Co. v. Auditor Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Auditor General v. OberMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Haven v. OwenMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Kennedy v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API