Montgomery v. Merrill
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Calhoun Circuit. The proof of service was amendable after judgment by showing the necessary facts, even without notice: Crawford v. Howard, 30 Me., 423; State v. Clark, 18 Mo., 432; Blaisdell v. Steamboat, 19 Mo., 157; Hitcher v. Beinsky, 42 Mo., 427; ' Webster v. Blount, 39 Id., 500; Whittier v. Vaughn, 27 Me., 301; Foster v. Woodfm, 65 N. C., 29; Mayo v. Whitston, 2 Jones (N. C.~), 231; Jackson v. O. & M. B. B. Co., 15 Ind., 192; Jones v. Lewis, 8 Ind., 7O';…
Read the full summary
Error to Calhoun Circuit. The proof of service was amendable after judgment by showing the necessary facts, even without notice: Crawford v. Howard, 30 Me., 423; State v. Clark, 18 Mo., 432; Blaisdell v. Steamboat, 19 Mo., 157; Hitcher v. Beinsky, 42 Mo., 427; ' Webster v. Blount, 39 Id., 500; Whittier v. Vaughn, 27 Me., 301; Foster v. Woodfm, 65 N. C., 29; Mayo v. Whitston, 2 Jones (N. C.~), 231; Jackson v. O. & M. B. B. Co., 15 Ind., 192; Jones v. Lewis, 8 Ind., 7O'; Montgomery v. Brown, 7 111., 581; Hall v. Williams, 10 Me., 278; Close v. Gillespie, 3 Johns., 526; KirJcwood v. Beidy, 10…
1Opinion of the Court
Cooley, Ch. J:
This case has twice before been in this court: Montgomery v. Merrill, 18 Mich., 338; Merrill v. Montgomery, 25 Mich., 73. It is an action of ejectment brought for lands which the plaintiff claims under an execution sale on a judgment against the Calhoun County Bank. The defendant is in possession, and though the nature of her claim is not disclosed by this record, it appeared when the case was before us in the first instance that she claimed under proceedings against the bank ante-dating the plaintiff’s judgment. The only questions which the present record brings up are: First,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rogers v. RogersNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
- Weed v. WeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
- Chichester v. CandeNew York Supreme Court · 1824
- Denison v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Wilkie v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chandler v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Morris v. DooleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Minetree v. MinetreeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- New York Baptist Union for Ministerial Education v. AtwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Stevens Mineral Co. v. MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.