Legal Opinion

Cole v. Shelp

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Ejectment. Defendant brings error. Reversed, and judgment entered for defendant. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiff derives his title to the lands in .suit by patent from the State of Michigan, and by mesne *58conveyances from the patentee to him. Defendant relies upon a tax deed from the Auditor General, dated September 17, 1891, for the delinquent taxes for the year 1887. The proceedings to enforce the tax lien, which resulted in a sale of the lands and the issuance of the deed in controversy, were had under the tax law of 1889. Plaintiff's grantor,' who was then the owner of the land, was not served with the subpoena, but was brought in by publication of the notice required by the statute. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re WileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Muirhead v. SandsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Peninsular Savings Bank v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hughes v. JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Ball v. Ridge Copper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Cole v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API