Legal Opinion

Burnet v. Harmel

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 7, 1932No. 26PublishedCited by 962 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Respondent, the owner in fee of Texas oil lands, executed oil and gas leases of the lands for three years and as long thereafter as oil or gas should be produced from them by the lessee, in return for bonus payments aggregating $57,000 in cash, and stipulated royalties, measured by the production of oil and gas by the lessee. In making his income tax returns under the Revenue Act of 1924 for the years 1924 and 1925, respondent reported the cash payments as gam from a sale of capital assets, taxable under the applicable section of the statute at a lower rate than other income. The Commissioner…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Tyler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by962 opinions

  1. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Morgan v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938

957 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API