Legal Opinion

Poe v. Seaborn

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 24, 1930No. 15PublishedCited by 560 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

Seaborn and his wife, citizens and residents of the State of Washington, made for the year 1927 separate income tax returns as permitted by the Revenue Act of 1926 c. 27, § 223 (U. S. C. App., Title 26, § 964).

During and prior to 1927 they accumulated property comprising real estate, stocks, bonds and other personal property. While the real estate stood in his name alone, it is undisputed that all of the property real and personal constituted community property and that neither owned any separate property or had any separate income.

The income comprised Seaborn’s salary, interest on bank…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. United States v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by560 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Morgan v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

555 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API