Legal Opinion

Jeter v. B.R. McGinty Mechanical

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 6, 1998No. CA 97-700PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John E. Jennings, Judge.

This is a workers’ compensation case. Appellant, Lee Wayne Jeter, appeals from an order of the Commission, which found that he failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that medical problems requiring surgery in July 1994 were a compensable consequence of his June 1991 com-pensable injury. He argues that the Commission’s finding is not supported by substantial evidence. Appellee, B.R. McGinty Mechanical, cross-appeals from the Commission’s order, arguing that the award of attorney’s fees is not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree, and affirm on both…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bearden Lumber Co. v. BondCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. HenningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. College Club Dairy v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Linthicum v. Mar-Bax Shirt Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Stephens Truck Lines v. MillicanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Williams v. Prostaff TemporariesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Air Compressor Equipment v. SwordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. K II Construction Co v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Patterson v. Frito Lay, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Oliver v. Guardsmark, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API