Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Yama Woodcraft, Inc., D/B/A Cal-Pacific Furniture Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1978No. 77-2367PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTELS, Senior District Judge:

The National Labor Relations Board petitions pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act (the Act), 29 U.S.C. § 160(e), for enforcement of its Order, 228 NLRB No. 169, finding respondent Yama Woodcraft guilty of unfair labor practices under Sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(5) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1) & (5). We find that the Board’s Order lacks substantial evidentiary support, and therefore deny enforcement.

Facts

In September 1975 the Board certified Furniture Union Local 500, Upholsterers’ International Union, AFL-CIO (the union) as the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Patent Trader, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. I.A.M. National Pension Fund v. Schulze Tool & Die Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1983
  2. Saunders House A/K/A the Old Man's Home of Philadelphia v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  3. Excavation-Construction, Inc. v. The National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  4. Alaska Public Employees Ass'n v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Labor RelationsAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Financial Institution Employees of America, Local No. 1182 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API