Legal Opinion
I.A.M. National Pension Fund v. Schulze Tool & Die Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 24, 1983No. C-82-2954 RFPPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
PECKHAM, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan C (“the Plan”) brought this action against defendant Schulze Tool and Die Company (“Schulze”) to collect both monthly contributions and withdrawal liability which the Plan claims Schulze owes to it under the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERI-SA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA” or “the Act”). Schulze counterclaimed for declaratory and injunctive relief, maintaining that it owed neither…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Parisi v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Marvin Hayes Lines, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Loran W. Robbins, Cross-Appellants v. McNicholas Transportation Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Combs v. Adkins & Adkins Coal Co., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- T.I.M.E.-DC, Inc. v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement FundDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1984
- Findlay Truck Line, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.