Legal Opinion

People v. Spillard

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1936No. Crim. 1488PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of violating section 288 of the Penal Code.

The motion for a new trial was denied, and appellant was committed to the state prison for the term prescribed by law. From the order denying the motion for a new trial and from the judgment of conviction defendant prosecuted this appeal.

Briefly the facts are that on a Saturday afternoon, either June 15, or June 22, 1935, the complaining witness, a little girl of about ten years of age, with four companions, two girls and two boys, ranging in ages from seven to thirteen years, went to a moving picture theater in Sacramento.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. People v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. People v. MurietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Federoff v. Birks Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. WestekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. CodinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Buckley v. CoreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API