Legal Opinion

Barney Cockburn & Sons v. Lane

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1941No. 4626PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Chief Justice.

The action below was upon a claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Irving L. Lane was killed while in the employ of the appellants, Barney Cockburn & Sons, hereinafter called appellants; and the Employers Casualty Company, hereinafter called Casualty Company, was surety for the employers. The appellees are the parents of the deceased Irving L. Lane, who had neither wife nor children, and who was killed in the course of his employment, October 16, 1939. He had been employed two weeks by appellant at the time of his death, at a weekly wage of $51.17.

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Chino Copper Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Merrill v. Penasco Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Parson v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  4. In re CarrollIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Sweet v. the Sherwood Ice Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Raborn v. HaytonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Brown v. General Insurance Company of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ferris v. Thomas Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Gallegos v. Homestake Mining Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Richards v. RichardsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API