Legal Opinion

Noland v. Noland

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 4, 1997No. 96-1555PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

This case raises two issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in shifting the burden of proof to appellants Jerry G. Noland, Anita Delores Shaver, and Helen Lorraine Hooton in an undue-influence case for the reason that they were beneficiaries of a trust and procured its creation; and (2) if so, whether the appellants proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the settlor of the trust, Wesley E. Noland, was of sound mind and free of undue influence when he created the trust. The trial court found that Wesley Noland was of unsound mind and not a free agent when he executed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rad-Razorback Ltd. Partnership v. B.G. Coney Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Rose v. DunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Holaday v. FrakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Riddick v. StreettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. McDaniel ad. v. CrosbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1858

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Conseco Life Insurance v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Myrick v. MyrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Davis v. Office of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Hamilton v. BarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API