Legal Opinion

Holaday v. Fraker

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 18, 1996No. 95-909PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Justice.

This appeal arises from a chancellor’s order finding that appellants had violated a restrictive covenant which prohibited use of their property for other than residential purposes, and requiring that appellants remove a shop building they constructed on the property. Appellants assert the chancellor erred in 1) interpreting the restrictive covenant to apply to the building erected by appellants and; 2) granting injunctive relief which required that appellants remove the building. We find no error and affirm.

Appellants Terry and Sandra Holaday purchased a lot with a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hercules Inc. v. PledgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Riddick v. StreettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Thompson v. SquibbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. McGuire v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Harbour v. NORTHWEST LAND CO. INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Lawhon Farm Services v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Cochran v. BentleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Jennings v. BurfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Myrick v. MyrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Noland v. NolandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API