Legal Opinion

Rose v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 13, 1984No. 84-143PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Webb Hubbell, Chief Justice.

Appellants, heirs at law of Mills O. Pierce, deceased, appeal from a consolidated proceeding where the court below declared valid a will, a deed, and two trusts, all executed by Mills O. Pierce. Appellants argue that: (1) the trial court erred in finding that Mills O. Pierce was competent at the execution of his will and in finding that the execution of the will was a free and voluntary act done without undue influence; (2) the court erred in refusing to shift the burden of proof; (3) the court erred in finding the deed was supported by consideration. We affirm.

Mill…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McCulloch v. CampbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  2. Greenwood v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Sullivant v. SullivantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Hiler v. CudeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Pledger v. BirkheadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Lake View School District No. 25 v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Rad-Razorback Ltd. Partnership v. B.G. Coney Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Conway Corp. v. Construction Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Noland v. NolandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. William L. Burkhalter v. Steven P. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API