Legal Opinion

Faust v. Paramore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 8, 1960No. 4 Div. 948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWYN, Justice.

The appellees, Hugh Paramore and Claudie Mae Paramore, filed a bill in the circuit court of Dale County, in equity, against appellant, R. L. Faust, to redeem certain lands from a mortgage foreclosure sale. Faust’s demurrer to the bill was overruled. Hs appealed from that ruling and we affirmed in Faust v. Paramore, 266 Ala. 9, 93 So.2d 787. Faust then answered the bill and an oral hearing was had before the trial court. A final decree was rendered on August 12, 1957, granting relief to Claudie Mae Paramore.

On September 11, 1957, Faust filed in the office of the register an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte FosheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Stuckey v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Ex Parte Leeth Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Ex parte BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. Faust v. ParamoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Montgomery v. NormanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  2. Wood v. Citronelle-Mobile Gathering System Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Faust v. ParamoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Moving Picture MacHine Operators Local No. 236 v. CaysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Moving Picture MacHine Operators Local No. 236 v. CaysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API