Legal Opinion

Moving Picture MacHine Operators Local No. 236 v. Cayson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 5, 1967No. 6 Div. 109Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

Appellants contend that Equity Rule 62 governs procedure on applications for rehearing in equity; that Rule 62 differs from and is in conflict with § 119, Title 13, with respect to the necessity for successive orders of continuance of an application for rehearing; that Rule 62 must prevail over § 119 under the reasoning in Faust v. Paramore, 272 Ala. 19, 127 So.2d 832; and, therefore, that we are in error in holding on original deliverance that the applications for rehearing had been discontinued and that the trial court erred in rendering the decree on rehearing which modified…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Faust v. ParamoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API