Legal Opinion

Ex parte Burns

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 20, 1957No. 8 Div. 891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWYN, Justice.

This is an original mandamus proceeding-brought by Elbert C. Burns to compel the respondent-judge to vacate certain orders which have the effect of making the provisions of Act No. 375, appvd. Sept. 8, 1955, Acts 1955, p. 901, Code 1940, Tit. 7, § 474 (1) et seq., Cumulative Pocket Part, applicable to a suit in equity pending in the circuit court of Lauderdale County, in equity. We granted the rule nisi and the respondent-judge has made answer thereto. Submission was had on the petition for mandamus and the respondent’s answer thereto.

The only question presented is whether…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Ex Parte FosheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Wooten v. RodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Galloway Coal Co. v. StanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Ex Parte RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Siegelman v. Chase Manhattan BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Carruba v. MeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Faust v. ParamoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Ex parte HannaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Siegelman v. Chase Manhattan BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API