Legal Opinion

Faust v. Paramore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 15, 1968No. 4 Div. 238PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff (appellee) filed an amended complaint in the Circuit Court of Dale County, Alabama, to recover judgment against appellant for use and occupation of a described tract of land. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff pursuant to an oral charge of the court that was equivalent to a directed verdict except as to the amount of damages for such use and occupation.

The evidence in all material respects was not in dispute except as to the damages for use and occupation. The evidence shows that appellant (defendant below) became *22the purchaser of appellee’s tract of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parmer v. ParmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Carlin v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Powell v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Faust v. ParamoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. Faust v. ParamoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Associates Investment Company v. HammSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API