Legal Opinion

Stuckey v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 3, 1931No. 4 Div. 564PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal is from a decree of the circuit court overruling the complainant's demurrers to the defendant's statutory cross-bill.

The only question argued is that presented by the second assignment of error, "The lower court erred in taking a submission on the demurrers under rule H as amended." This same question was presented to this court in Spear et al. v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp., 136 So. 805,1 and it was there held that said rule H, adopted by the circuit court, allowing submissions for decree on demurrer without notice, was inconsistent with rule 74 of Chancery Practice, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McCall v. McCurdySupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Ex parte Branch & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. Griffith v. VentressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Ex Parte BrickellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. West v. State Ex Rel. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Averett v. AverettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Hall v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Thomasson v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Ex parte BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API