Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
I
We must first determine whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied Dr. Phung’s request to present the testimony of his sister, Betsy Phung, and his first wife, Faye Phung, to rebut the testimony of WMI’s expert witness, Dr. Elissa P. Benedek. For the following reasons, we conclude that the trial court abused its discretion.
A
When Dr. Phung’s counsel indicated he would be calling the two witnesses, counsel for WMI objected, contending that the witnesses’ rebuttal testimony would be cumulative and, thus, unnecessary. Additionally, WMI argued that Dr. Phung was precluded from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Painter v. GraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- National Amusements, Inc. v. City of SpringdaleOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Reamsnyder v. JaskolskiOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Katz v. EnzerOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by122 opinions
- Lucas Burgess v. Gene FischerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Hopkins v. DyerOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Lakota Local School District Board of Education v. BricknerOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Tuleta v. Med. Mut. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Beckloff v. Amcor Rigid Plastics USA, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.