Legal Opinion
Lucas Burgess v. Gene Fischer
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 1, 2013No. 12-4191PublishedCited by 1,104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Lucas and Angela Burgess (collectively “Plaintiffs”) appeal the summary judgment order that dismissed their excessive force, failure to intervene, deliberate indifference to a serious medical need, and municipal liability claims raised pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, as well as various state law claims, against Defendants. The district court granted Defendants summary judgment on all claims on the basis of qualified immunity, state law immunity, or failure to set forth sufficient facts to establish a prima facie…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,104 opinions
- Joe D'Ambrosio v. Carmen MarinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Kwame Ajamu v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Richard Wesley v. Alison CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Phillip Cordell v. Glen McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Shari Guertin v. State of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
1,099 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.