Legal Opinion

Reamsnyder v. Jaskolski

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1984No. 83-952PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Per curiam

Since the grant of appellees’ Civ. R. 12(B)(6) motions and their affirmance by the court of appeals in the case sub judice, this court has recognized the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. See Yeager v. Local Union 20 (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 369, where the court held:

“One who by extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes serious emotional distress to another is subject to liability for such emotional distress, and if bodily harm to the other results from it, for such bodily harm.”

The intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress is an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Josephine GAGNÉ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. Morrow v. Reminger & Reminger Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Martha Sabol Wright John C. Wright, Jr. v. Metrohealth Medical Center, Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API