Legal Opinion
Crow v. California Department of Human Resources
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 12, 1970No. C-70 1128PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WOLLENBERG, District Judge.
This case follows in the wake of Java, et al. v. California Department, etc., et al., 317 F.Supp. 875 (N.D.Calif., 1970). Java held that Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 90 S.Ct. 1011, 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970), which mandates a due process “fair hearing” prior to termination of welfare benefits, applies equally well to the unemployment compensation field, and that the ends of the Social Security Act, as well as of the Constitution, are best served when persons who have once been found eligible for benefits continue…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Spielman-Fond, Inc. v. Hanson's, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1973
- Wolf v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Coral Gables Convalescent Home, Inc. v. RichardsonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1972
- Steinberg v. FusariDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.