Legal Opinion
Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 15, 2001No. 99-17073PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RONALD M. GOULD; Dissent by BETTY B. FLETCHER.
RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judge:
This is a products liability action involving pacemakers containing the allegedly defective ENCOR Bipolar Passive Fixation Pacing Lead Model 380-854 (“854 lead”). Plaintiff-Appellant Robin Zinser (“Zinser”) filed a class action complaint alleging negligence, products liability, negligent misrepresentation, fraud and deceit, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty, and infliction of emotional distress against defendant Aceufix Research Institute (“ARI”), formerly Te-lectronics Pacing…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- James L. Ticknor Janet Ticknor Larry Ticknor Tickco Holding, L.L.C. Ticknor Lodging Corporation v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Aaron Espenscheid v. DirectSat USACourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Zarrella v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Californians for Disability Rights, Inc. v. California Department of TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.