Spielman-Fond, Inc. v. Hanson's, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
The sole issue presented in this action is whether the Arizona statutes relating to mechanics’ and materialmen’s liens, A.R.S. § 33-981 et seq., are in violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Defendants Yanke and Hanson’s companies furnished labor and materials to plaintiffs in connection with the development of plaintiffs’ mobile home park. Claiming that they had been unpaid for labor performed and for materials supplied, these defendants caused liens affecting plaintiffs’ property to be recorded with the…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by65 opinions
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Barry Properties v. Fick Bros. Roofing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Connolly Development, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Paul D. Reardon and John E. Reardon v. United States of America and the United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Chrysler Corporation v. Fedders Corporation, Salvatore Giordano, Sr., Salvatore Giordano, Jr., Bruno Giordano, Ignatius MacBrinn and Howard S. ModlinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.