Legal Opinion

Steinberg v. Fusari

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 17, 1973No. Civ. 15104PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge:

This suit presents the question of whether either the Fourteenth Amendment, or § 303 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 503(a)(1), requires that recipients of Connecticut unemployment compensation benefits be afforded a Goldberg v. Kelly 1 hearing prior to being deprived of such payments. In addition, this ease requires us to interpret the precise precedential significance of a series of rather bewildering summary dispositions of factually related suits by the Supreme Court. 2 For the reasons given below, we conclude that the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Fusari v. SteinbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Mary Ann Kelly v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Shaw v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Allen v. State of West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Wilson v. Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Supreme Court · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API