Steinberg v. Fusari
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge:
This suit presents the question of whether either the Fourteenth Amendment, or § 303 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 503(a)(1), requires that recipients of Connecticut unemployment compensation benefits be afforded a Goldberg v. Kelly 1 hearing prior to being deprived of such payments. In addition, this ease requires us to interpret the precise precedential significance of a series of rather bewildering summary dispositions of factually related suits by the Supreme Court. 2 For the reasons given below, we conclude that the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Fusari v. SteinbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mary Ann Kelly v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Shaw v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Allen v. State of West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Wilson v. Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.