Rose v. Park Bank
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from thé Laporte• Circuit Court.
1Per curiam
Suit by the Park Bank, of New York, the holder of a promissory note, against Rose, the maker, and Walker and Early, indorsers.
The note and indorsement read thus:
$6,000. Laporte, Indiana, September 24, 1858.
Sixty days after date, I promise to pay to the order of Sam*95uel Burson 6,000 dollars, at 'the Bark Bank, New York, value received. D, G-. Rose.
Indorsed: Samuel Burson, IF .7, Walker.
Pay Park Bank, John Early.
The evidence shows that Burson is dead; that he and Walker indorsed the note at Laporte, Indiana, but that Early, at least, the Court might infer so, indorsed the note in New York.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cook v. LitchfieldThe Superior Court of New York City · 1851
- Rose v. President of Thames BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Walker v. Ocean BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Aurora v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Browning v. MerrittIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Fordyce v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Kiess v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Smith v. ZabelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.