Legal Opinion

Rose v. Park Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1863PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from thé Laporte• Circuit Court.

1Per curiam

Suit by the Park Bank, of New York, the holder of a promissory note, against Rose, the maker, and Walker and Early, indorsers.

The note and indorsement read thus:

$6,000. Laporte, Indiana, September 24, 1858.

Sixty days after date, I promise to pay to the order of Sam*95uel Burson 6,000 dollars, at 'the Bark Bank, New York, value received. D, G-. Rose.

Indorsed: Samuel Burson, IF .7, Walker.

Pay Park Bank, John Early.

The evidence shows that Burson is dead; that he and Walker indorsed the note at Laporte, Indiana, but that Early, at least, the Court might infer so, indorsed the note in New York.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cook v. LitchfieldThe Superior Court of New York City · 1851
  2. Rose v. President of Thames BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Walker v. Ocean BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Aurora v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Browning v. MerrittIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Fordyce v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Kiess v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  5. Smith v. ZabelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API