Legal Opinion

Rose v. President of Thames Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1860PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the La Porte Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Suit by the bank as indorsee, against Rose as indorser, of a promissory note. The bank was shown to be a corporation created by the laws of the State of Connecticut. The note sued upon reads as follows, viz :

“ $5,000. Horwalle, June 29, 1857.
“ Three months after date I promise to pay to the order of D. G. Rose, Esq., five thousand dollars, at the Hartford bank, Harford, Connecticut. Yalue received.

(Signed,) '•'■Peter Latimer.”

(Indorsed,) “D. G. Rose, La Porte, Indiana.”

_ One paragraph of the complaint alleged that the note was made and indorsed in Ohio; and another paragraph alleged the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shaw v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Piano Manufacturing Co. v. CavenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Baltimore, Ohio & Chicago Railway Co. v. ScholesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Irose v. BallaIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Rose v. Park BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Bombolaski v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API