Rose v. President of Thames Bank
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the La Porte Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.
Suit by the bank as indorsee, against Rose as indorser, of a promissory note. The bank was shown to be a corporation created by the laws of the State of Connecticut. The note sued upon reads as follows, viz :
“ $5,000. Horwalle, June 29, 1857.
“ Three months after date I promise to pay to the order of D. G. Rose, Esq., five thousand dollars, at the Hartford bank, Harford, Connecticut. Yalue received.
(Signed,) '•'■Peter Latimer.”
(Indorsed,) “D. G. Rose, La Porte, Indiana.”
_ One paragraph of the complaint alleged that the note was made and indorsed in Ohio; and another paragraph alleged the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shaw v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by7 opinions
- Indianapolis Piano Manufacturing Co. v. CavenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Baltimore, Ohio & Chicago Railway Co. v. ScholesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Irose v. BallaIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Rose v. Park BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Bombolaski v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.