Legal Opinion
Kiess v. Baldwin
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 3, 1934No. 6184PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
This is an action begun in the lower court by the receiver of the Commercial National Bank of Washington against appellant, Roemer C. Kiess, as defendant, for the recovery of a judgment upon a certain promissory note executed and delivered by her to the bank.
In the declaration the receiver alleged that on January 11, 1929, the defendant signed and delivered to the bank her certain promissory note in the sum of $12,352.20 payable to the bank at its banking house in Washington, D. C., upon demand, secured by a pledge of 30 shares of stock of the National City Bank of New…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strong v. . SheffieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Hunt v. StandartIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Turle v. SargentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Bradt v. . KrankNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Widger v. BaxterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- First National City Bank v. ValentineNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Kiess v. BaldwinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
- Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. TitusDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1941
- Bader v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948