Legal Opinion

Fordyce v. Nelson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1883No. 10,883PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

— The appellee, as the endorsee and as-signee of two promissory notes made by the appellant, brought this suit against him.

The complaint was in two paragraphs, each of which averred the execution of a note by the defendant, its endorsement before maturity by the payee to the firm of Nelson & Noel,, and the assignment by Noel of all his interest to his partner,, the plaintiff, before the maturity of the paper.

Copies of the notes were made a part of the complaint; they were alleged to be due and unpaid, and each paragraph set forth certain statutes of Missouri, in which State the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hunt v. StandartIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Treadway v. CobbIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Browning v. MerrittIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Groves v. RubyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Keith v. ChamperIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. James v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Garrigue v. KellarIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Magenheimer v. CouncilmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. John A. Boyd Motor Co. v. ClaffeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Price v. ElmbankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API