Legal Opinion
Willis v. Bell
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 4, 1989No. 86 C 9589PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1
SHADUR, District Judge.
Maceo Willis (“Willis”) has sued several City of Chicago (“City”) police officers (collectively “Officers”), 2 Chicago Police Superintendent LeRoy Martin (“Martin”) 3 and City itself under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983"), claiming numerous violations of Willis’ constitutional rights incident to his arrest and detention by Officers from February 11 to 13, 1985. 4 In May 1988 all defendants moved for summary judgment under Rule 56. This Court’s May 27, 1988 memorandum opinion and order (the “Opinion,” 687 F.Supp. 380 5 ) dismissed several…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- MacEo G. Willis, Jr. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Petit v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Doe v. Douglas County School District RE-1District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Limes-Miller v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Bullock v. DioguardiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.