Legal Opinion
In Re the Eligibility of the Persons Employed at the St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1941No. 28146PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
This case involves unemployment compensation claimed by employees of the St. Paul and Tacoma Lumber Company. The company is engaged in the large scale production of lumber and timber products, with its manufacturing plant located in the city of Tacoma. The plant included a sawmill, a shingle mill, and private booming and sorting grounds. It had two logging camps located near Kapowsin and Ohop, in Pierce county. The company’s employees number approximately twelve hundred men, the largest portion of whom work in the woods and sawmill.
The woods and sawmill groups were members of the Timber…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Sweitzer v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- L'Hote v. CrowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Hidden Oaks Limited, Hidden Oaks Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The City of Austin, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Ancheta v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- MacEy v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Bunny's Waffle Shop, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- In Re the Employees of Buffelen Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.