Legal Opinion

Bamberger Electric R. v. Public Utilities Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1922No. 3738PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Application by the Bamberger Electric Railroad Company and others for a writ of re'view against the Public Utilities Commission of Utah.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiffs filed an application in this court, praying for a writ of review against the Public Utilities Commission of Utah, hereinafter called Commission. In the application various grounds are alleged why the Commission acted with*353out or in excess of its authority or jurisdiction in making a certain order in which the Commission ordered a certain railroad crossing vacated and discontinued, to which crossing more particular reference will hereinafter be made. A writ as prayed for was duly issued, and the Commission has duly certified the proceedings to this court.

The questions arising…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. City of Columbus v. DahnIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Stickley v. Township of SodusMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. BaudatCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. Public Service Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Provo River Water Users' Ass'n v. CarlsonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Denver & R. G. W. R. Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Robinett v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Union Pac. R. Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API