Robinett v. Price
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.
This action was brought to recover, damages alleged to have resulted from the closing and discontinuance of a portion of Tenth street, in Price, Utah. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.
No point is made that the municipality had not the right to close and discontinue the street. There was a question raised as to whether or not the street was a public street. We think there was sufficient evidence to show the street was a public street, and as to that question the plaintiff was entitled to go to the jury. The principal point, however, presented…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tilly v. Mitchell & Lewis Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Dantzer v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Ponischil v. Hoquiam Sash & Door Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- Cram v. LaconiaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901
- O'Brien v. Central Iron & Steel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. HoblittMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Board of County Com'rs v. SlaughterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
- Springville Banking Co. v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1960
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. DanfelserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.