City of Columbus v. Dahn
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Bartholomew Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtWorden, C. J.
This was an action by the city against the appellee commenced before the mayor, to recover a penalty for the violation of a city ordinance, by fencing up and thereby obstructing a street in said city. On appeal to the common pleas there was a trial by jury, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant. The questions sought to be raised in the case are preserved by the record.
The case seems to have been made out clearly enough, if the ground fenced up was a street. This was the disputed *331point. The supposed street was never laid out by any public authority, and it became such, if…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thurston v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Seymour v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Wilder v. City of Saint PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
- The People v. . SaxtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Zimmerman v. MarchlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Morgan v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- City of Indianapolis v. KingsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Over v. SchifflingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Springer v. ByramIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NoftsgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.