Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1954No. Crim. 3039PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. An information filed March 9, 1954, by the district attorney of Alameda County, charged Garfield Smith, appellant herein, Vernal Owens and Lawson Thomas Venson with burglary in that on December 11, 1953, they entered the jewelry store of Clement L. Palmer in Oakland, California, with the intent to commit theft therein.

After jury trial, appellant was found guilty and the jury fixed the degree of the offense as second degree burglary. Motion for new trial was denied and appellant was sentenced to the Alameda County jail…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. People v. DraperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. ZyduckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. People v. GregorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. WeemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API