Legal Opinion

People v. Weems

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1961No. Crim. 7630PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

In a jury trial defendant was convicted of two counts of burglary. He has appealed from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. He also has attempted to appeal from the verdict and from the order denying his motion to set aside the information under section 995 of the Penal Code. His sole contention is that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict against him. In passing upon the merits of this contention, we shall view the record in the light most favorable to the People as we are required to do following a guilty verdict. (People v. Sweeney, 55…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. WilkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. People v. CarrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. People v. NazaroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API