People v. Clark

NUTTER, J. pro tem. *

After a court trial, appellant was convicted of burglary in second degree. He was sentenced to state’s prison; the sentence to run concurrently with another sentence. The appeal is from this judgment. Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient and the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion for a new trial.

Before a judgment may be reversed for insufficiency of the evidence, it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient substantial evidence to support the conclusion reached in the trial court. (People v. Alison, 189…