Legal Opinion

Azeria v. California Adult Authority

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1961No. Civ. 19633PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuniway, J.

Appeal from denial of a petition for writ of mandate. The appeal is in propria persona and upon the clerk’s transcript alone. So far as appears, no answer to the petition was filed and no evidence was offered or received. There does not seem to have been any appearance below in opposition to the petition. Under Code of Civil Procedure, section 1088, the writ cannot be granted by default, and, if no answer be filed, the court may hear the case on the papers of the applicant (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094, and cf. § 1107). It is thus clear that, in a proper case, the court can act upon the petition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. HarmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In Re McLainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Roberts v. DuffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. In Re MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In Re HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Loder v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Frank Sturm v. California Adult Authority, Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden of San Quentin State Prison, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. Star Motor Imports, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. In Re TroglinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API