In Re Harris
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
The question involved here is whether Resolution No. 83, adopted by the Adult Authority, in its application to petitioner’s situation, is a reasonable exercise of the power given to it by the Legislature, and whether petitioner shall be considered as a first-termer or second-termer for certain purposes.
Petitioner is presently confined in San Quentin prison. On July 19, 1946, he was received there under sentence of imprisonment for the crime of violating section 503 of the Vehicle Code (auto conversion). This section prescribes punishment in the state prison for not less than one nor more than…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. DawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. DenneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. HolfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re TroglinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- In Re StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.