Legal Opinion

In Re Mills

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1961No. Crim. 6766PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

— James Mills, an inmate of the state "prison at Folsom, petitions for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the judgment under which he was convicted was void and is a nullity, and that the Adult Authority’s present refusal to fix his indeterminate sentence is a denial of due process.

From matters set forth in the petition and in the return to our order to show cause directed to Robert A. Heinze, Warden of the Folsom State Prison, it appears that the petitioner and a codefendant were charged by information of an “attempt to violate Section 211 of the Penal Code (Robbery), in that on or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. United States v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. HarmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. In Re BrambleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. WingoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In Re WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Azeria v. California Adult AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API