Legal Opinion

In re Simpson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 18 opinions

In the matter of Leslie A. Simpson. Motion to reinstate attorney. Granted.

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, C. J.

On the 1st day of September, 1902, term of this court, a motion was made by Honorable Tracy R. Bangs and Honorable John M. Cochrane for the reinstatement of Leslie A. Simpson, who was disbarred for unprofessional conduct by an order of this court dated July 12, 1900. The disbarment proceedings are reported in 9 N. D. 379, 83 N. W. Rep. 541. A similar motion for reinstatement was made at the September, 1901, term of court, and was denied. On the former motion no proof which we 'could judicially consider was offered, either to contradict or to excuse the unprofessional acts upon which the order…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re SimpsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  2. In re TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State v. BurrellMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. In re EnrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
  5. In re HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In re EganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. In Re StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. In re SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Application of Smith for Reinstatement as AttorneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API