Legal Opinion

Ingwersen v. Carr

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 22, 1917PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from ' Crawford District Co-urt. — F. 1\I. Powers, Judge.. This is an action at law against defendants as copartners practicing medicine and surgery, for damages for malpractice. Trial to a jury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal. —

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The petition alleges that, about July 15, 1912, plaintiff sustained a fracture of his left arm, the humerus being broken at the juncture of the upper and middle thirds, the broken ends of the bone being so separated and not in apposition that the musculospiral nerve was drawn in between said pieces of bone; that defendants were called and plaintiff continued under their treatment until about September 7, 1912, at (which time defendants abandoned his case; that plaintiff has lost 17 months’ time, has suffered severe pain and mental anguish, has incurred hospital bills and surgeons’ fees, his…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Manufacturers' Accident Indemnity Co. v. DorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  2. Bruggeman v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Bever v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Stutsman v. SharplessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ganrud v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Morton v. Equitable Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  3. Auten v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. O'Connor v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Eller v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API