Albert Lea Ice & Fuel Co. v. United States Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Christianson, Justice.
Action is brought by plaintiff, Albert Lea Ice and Fuel Company, against defendant insurers to recover for damages to plaintiff’s icehouse allegedly caused by windstorm. The policies in question insured the icehouse against fire loss and in addition “direct loss by windstorm.” The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendants appeal from an order denying their alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
The icehouse in question is of wood construction and is located on the north side of Fountain Lake in Albert Lea, Minnesota. The…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. v. Board of Ed.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Hiber v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Jordan v. Iowa Mutual Tornado InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Woyak v. KonieskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Gerhard v. Travelers Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Bush v. CrowtherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Gardner v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Great American Insurance v. Railroad Furniture Salvage of Mobile, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- In Re Declaration of Trust by BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.