Legal Opinion

Ruth v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided June 21, 2005No. 14-03-01158-CRPublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE BROCK YATES, Justice.

Appellant, Joseph Pernell Ruth, appeals his conviction for the murder of Kenjenea Williams. In seven issues, appellant makes the following claims: the trial court erred in permitting his daughter to be cross-examined with a prior written statement, admission of his wife’s hearsay statements violated his right of confrontation, the trial court erred in admitting appellant’s statements to the police, and the evidence is factually insufficient to support the verdict. We affirm.

Factual and PROCEDURAL Background

Appellant is married to Clara Ruth, and they have…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Ford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  2. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Dixon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  4. Quadreuy Flowers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
  5. Cook v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API