Ruth v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE BROCK YATES, Justice.
Appellant, Joseph Pernell Ruth, appeals his conviction for the murder of Kenjenea Williams. In seven issues, appellant makes the following claims: the trial court erred in permitting his daughter to be cross-examined with a prior written statement, admission of his wife’s hearsay statements violated his right of confrontation, the trial court erred in admitting appellant’s statements to the police, and the evidence is factually insufficient to support the verdict. We affirm.
Factual and PROCEDURAL Background
Appellant is married to Clara Ruth, and they have…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Ford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Dixon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Quadreuy Flowers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
- Cook v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.