Legal Opinion

Cook v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided July 20, 2006No. 01-05-00107-CRPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JANE BLAND, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant, Neil Andrew Cook, of driving while intoxicated and assessed punishment at 365 days in jail. 1 On appeal, Cook contends the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a tape of the 911 call made by a witness because (1) it violated the Confrontation Clause, and (2) it was hearsay. We follow the precedent of the United States Supreme Court in Davis v. Washington 2 , and therefore affirm.

Facts

In September 2004, while driving on Barker-Cypress Road, Lonnie Gautreau observed Cook gesture obscenely and throw a beer bottle at his truck.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. KirbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Vinson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  4. Mauricio Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
  5. Wilder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API