Cook v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JANE BLAND, Justice.
A jury convicted appellant, Neil Andrew Cook, of driving while intoxicated and assessed punishment at 365 days in jail. 1 On appeal, Cook contends the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a tape of the 911 call made by a witness because (1) it violated the Confrontation Clause, and (2) it was hearsay. We follow the precedent of the United States Supreme Court in Davis v. Washington 2 , and therefore affirm.
Facts
In September 2004, while driving on Barker-Cypress Road, Lonnie Gautreau observed Cook gesture obscenely and throw a beer bottle at his truck.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Vinson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Mauricio Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
- Wilder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.